Review Policy

Reviewer Prosiding SENALA: Seminar Nasional Linguistik Indonesia should meet the following policies of review:

AI-generated review

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) generated or assisted review comments are strictly prohibited during peer review.

Confidentiality and ethics

  • Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality regarding the information of the articles they review.
  • They should act ethically and disclose any conflicts of interest to the editor.

Qualifications and expertise

  • Reviewers should possess qualifications and expertise relevant to the research field of the assigned article.
  • They are expected to provide feedback based on their knowledge and relevant expertise.

Reasonable review time

  • Reviewers are expected to provide assessments within a reasonable time frame and in accordance with the deadlines set by the editor.
  • If unable to complete the review within the specified time, it is expected to inform the editor in advance.

Thoroughness and clarity

  • Reviewers should provide clear, constructive, and in-depth reviews of the articles.
  • They are expected to justify and support any suggestions or decisions they make.

Identification of plagiarism

  • Reviewers are expected to identify potential plagiarism and report it if detected.
  • They must ensure that all references and sources are cited correctly.

Openness and transparency

  • Reviewers should be transparent about their perspectives and evaluation approaches.
  • They are expected to provide comments that are constructive and solution-oriented.

Disagreement or dispute

  • If reviewers disagree with the assessment or editorial decisions, they should express these differences of opinion politely and academically.
  • Editors are expected to manage conflicts and disagreements wisely.

Professional development

  • Reviewers should continuously improve their skills through training and ongoing learning.
  • They should maintain integrity and high standards in performing their reviewing duties.

Effective communication

  • If revisions are needed, reviewers are expected to provide clear guidance and facilitate effective communication with authors.
  • They should be ready to provide additional explanations or clarifications if necessary.