Analisis Linguistik Forensik Benturan Habitus dan Logika Korporasi dalam Ekosistem Birokrasi Episentrum Ibu Kota Nusantara

Authors

  • Ali Kusno Balai Bahasa Provinsi Kalimantan Timur
  • Kundharu Saddhono Pascasarjana Bahasa Indonesia FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakata
  • Raheni Suhita FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Keywords:

corporate logic, empathy dissonance, forensic linguistics, sociopragmatics, habitus clash

Abstract

Background: The relocation of the Nusantara Capital City (IKN) to East Kalimantan has fundamentally transformed the region into a sensitive national epicenter, shifting local public communication into the national spotlight. In this transitional governance ecosystem, official diction and institutional discourse significantly influence the stability of public perception. Nevertheless, profound communication crises have occurred alongside massive public protests on April 21, 2026. Purpose: This study aims to meticulously examine the sociolinguistic roots of this bureaucratic communication crisis by analyzing the phenomenon of habitus clash and the forceful application of corporate logic within the official statements of the Governor of East Kalimantan. Methods: Employing a forensic content analysis combined with a situation analysis single-case study design, this qualitative research utilizes sociopragmatics and Dell Hymes' SPEAKING model. It examines 6 purposively selected utterances from 18 documented utterance units collected from 1 official video recording and 7 online news reports during February–April 2026. Results: While institutional readings may view these statements as routine crisis clarifications, sociopragmatic and SPEAKING analyses indicate that the speaker's entrepreneurial background prominently manifests in pseudo-accommodation, statistical topic shifting, and referential narrowing when justifying facilities such as official vehicles, massage chairs, and marine aquariums. Forensically, these patterns do not prove malicious intent (mens rea), but strongly reflect linguistic insensitivity that potentially increases public distrust and cyber-dispute vulnerabilities. Conclusion: Uncalibrated corporate communication logic in regional bureaucracy risks eroding institutional legitimacy. Therefore, proactive mitigation of semantic risks is crucially needed to prevent mass cyber-dispute vulnerabilities and reconstruct transparent, empathetic public communication in the new capital epicenter.

Author Biographies

Kundharu Saddhono, Pascasarjana Bahasa Indonesia FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakata

Prof. Dr. Kundharu Saddhono, S.S., M.Hum. adalah seorang akademisi terkemuka dan Guru Besar bidang Sosiolinguistik dari Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Surakarta. Beliau menyelesaikan pendidikan S1 Sastra Indonesia dan S2 Linguistik di UNS, serta meraih gelar Doktor (S3) Sosiolinguistik dari Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM). Fokus keahlian utama beliau mencakup sosiolinguistik, pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA), sastra, dan budaya Nusantara. Di kancah akademik nasional maupun internasional, beliau aktif melakukan riset interdisipliner dan tercatat sebagai ilmuwan produktif yang masuk dalam jajaran peneliti berpengaruh dunia serta World Top Scientist. Selain aktif mengajar dan membimbing mahasiswa pascasarjana, beliau juga terlibat dalam berbagai organisasi profesi kebahasaan dan pengembangan pusat unggulan kebudayaan untuk memperkuat posisi Bahasa Indonesia di tingkat global.

Raheni Suhita, FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Dr. Dra. Raheni Suhita, M.Hum. adalah seorang akademisi dan dosen senior di Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Surakarta. Beliau menyelesaikan seluruh jenjang pendidikan tingginya di UNS, mulai dari S1 Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, S2 Linguistik Pembelajaran, hingga meraih gelar Doktor (S3) Linguistik Pengajaran Bahasa. Sebagai seorang pengajar dan peneliti, beliau memiliki fokus keahlian utama dalam bidang pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia, sosiolinguistik, sastra dan budaya Jawa, serta pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA). Selain aktif mengajar di program studi terkait, beliau juga tergabung dalam Grup Riset Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Indonesia, serta aktif mengembangkan berbagai inovasi pembelajaran, seperti integrasi budaya lokal dan teknologi dalam metode pengajaran bahasa, serta publikasi ilmiah di berbagai jurnal nasional maupun internasional.

References

Ashurov, B. S. (2026). Methodological and Analytical Approaches to Research Methods in Contemporary Forensic Linguistic Studies. Scientific Electronic Journal “Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan, Vol. 12026. https://journalfledu.com/

Carolina, L. A., & Mukti, A. (2020). Budaya Birokrasi Paternalisme di Indonesia. Jurnal Mahasiswa Administrasi Negara (JMAN), 4 (1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.31002/jman.v4i1.885

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237233

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence (1st ed.). Routledge.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Daftar Kontroversi Gubernur Kaltim Rudy Mas’ud Berujung Aksi 21 April. (2026). CNNIndonesia.com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20260427113548-32-1352471/daftar-kontroversi-gubernur-kaltim-rudy-masud-berujung-aksi-21-april

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge.

Erdmann, G., & Engel, U. (2006). Neopatrimonialism Revisited: Beyond a Catch-All Concept. GIGA Working Papers, 16, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.922037

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Gubernur Kaltim Respons Aksi 21 April: Masukannya Sangat Berkelas. (2026). CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20260421204152-20-1350562/gubernur-kaltim-respons-aksi-21-april-masukannya-sangat-berkelas

Hartini, L., Saifullah, A. R., & Sudana, D. (2020). Linguistik Forensik Terhadap Perbuatan Tidak Menyenangkan di Media Sosial (Kajian Pragmatik). Deiksis, 12(03), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v12i03.5416

Hasbullah, H., & Wahyono, S. (2020). Budaya Paternalistik dalam Perumusan Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Yustisia, 21(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.53712/yustitia.v21i2.1016

Hayati, R. (2019). Pengertian Studi Kasus, Jenis, Tujuan, dan Contohnya. Penelitianilmiah.com.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Hussain, M., Khan, U., & Khan, M. A. (2025). Applied Linguistics and Law: A Review of Forensic linguistics Research Trends, Challenges, and Innovations. Advance Social Science Archive Journal, 4(1), 4046–4060. https://assajournal.com/index.php/36/article/view/886/1329

Ilhami, M. W., Nurfajriaani, W. V., Mahendra, A., & Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Penerapan Metode Studi Kasus Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, Mei 2024,. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11180129

Ismaeel, I. T. (2026). The Pragmatic Functions of Apologies and Requests in Mobile-Based Role Play Scenarios. Manar Elsharq Journal for Literature and Language Studies, 4(3), 43–58. https://meijournals.com/ara/index.php/mejlls/article/download/1696/1596/1778

Iswatiningsih, D. (2016). Etnografi Komunikasi: Sebuah Pendekatan dalam Mengkaji Perilaku Masyarakat Tutur Perempuan Jawa. Seminar Nasional Prasasti (Pragmatik: Sastra Dan Linguistik).

Juliansah, M. Y., & Sukmana, O. (2026). Political Communication Dysfunction: The Impact of Controversial Statements by Public Officials on Public Trust. Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry, Vol 2 No 1, 50–62. https://scriptaintelektual.com/custodia/article/view/1190/1088

Kusno, A. (2025). Linguistik Forensik Indonesia: Pengantar, Teori, dan Praktik (Edisi I). RV Pustaka Horizon.

Kusno, A. (2026a). Lidah Penguasa Nalar Jelata: Analisis Linguistik Forensik atas Isu Hukum dan Sosial (Wahdatun Nisa (Ed.); I). RV Pustaka Horizon.

Kusno, A. (2026b). Mari Beri Kesempatan. Tribun Kaltim. https://kaltim.tribunnews.com/opini/1146607/mari-berikan-kesempatan

Kusno, A. (2026c). Mari Berikan Kesempatan. Kaltim Post. https://kaltimpost.jawapos.com/opini/2604290001/mari-berikan-kesempatan

Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik (M. D. D. Oka (Ed.); I). Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Leijerholt, U., Biedenbach, G., & Hultén, P. (2019). Branding in the public sector: a systematic literature review and directions for future research. Journal of Brand Management, 26(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0116-2

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mintowati, M. (2016). Pencemaran Nama Baik: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Paramasastra, Volume 3 N.

Moleong, L. J. (1994). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (25th ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Okolie, A. M. (2012). Neo-patrimonialism and the discourse of state failure in Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 39(131), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2012.658719

Pasaribu, E., & Syamsuri, A. R. (2025). Dilema neo-patrimonialisme dalam birokrasi modern: Analisis pengisian jabatan struktural di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Selatan. Jurnal Bisnis Mahasiswa, 5(6), 2999–3010. https://doi.org/10.60036/jbm.879

Putsanra, D. V. (2026). Daftar Kontroversi Gubernur Kaltim Rudy Mas’ud hingga Didemo. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/daftar-kontroversi-rudy-masud-hingga-didemo-warga-kaltim-huJV

Rahardi, K. (2009). Sosiopragmatik (W. Hardani (Ed.); 5th ed.). PT Gelora Aksara Pratama.

Rahardi, K., Setyaningsih, Y., & Dewi, R. P. (2020). Pragmatik: Fenomena Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa (4th ed.). Penerbit Erlangga.

Rahayu, R. (2026). Anggaran Makan Pemprov Capai Rp 10 M, Rudy Mas’ud Sebut Menurun. Detikkalimantan. https://www.detik.com/kalimantan/berita/d-8461234/anggaran-makan-pemprov-capai-rp-10-m-rudy-masud-sebut-menurun

Rambe, N. F. Q., Attas, S. G. A., & Leiliyanti, E. (2026). Political Presidential Linguistic Strategic in Published, Discourse: A Literature of Review of Studies 2022--2026. International Journal of Language and Culture, 4 Nomor 1, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.63762/ijolac.v4i1.54

Saifudin, A. (2020). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Linguistik. LITE, Volume 15, 1–16.

Saputra, E. (2026). Bela Diri Soal Tunjuk Adik Jadi Tim Ahli, Gubernur Kaltim Bandingkan dengan Prabowo-Hashim. Bangkapos.com. https://bangka.tribunnews.com/news/1682840/bela-diri-soal-tunjuk-adik-jadi-tim-ahli-gubernur-kaltim-bandingkan-dengan-prabowo-hashim

Simanjorong, S. A. (2026). Akuarium Air Laut dan Kursi Pijat Jadi Kontroversi, Rudy Mas’ud Janji Tanggung Pakai Uang Pribadi. Tribun Medan.com. https://medan.tribunnews.com/news/1791748/akuarium-air-laut-dan-kursi-pijat-jadi-kontroversi-rudy-masud-janji-tanggung-pakai-uang-pribadi?page=3#google_vignette

Utz, S., Schultz, F., & Glocka, S. (2013). Crisis communication online: How medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.010

Wulandari, S. (2022). Pembangunan IKN di Kaltim Memerlukan Infrastruktur Sosial. Diskominfo Kaltim. https://diskominfo.kaltimprov.go.id/berita/pembangunan-ikn-di-kaltim-memerlukan-infrastruktur-sosial

Zhang, K. (2021). Teori Administrasi Publik: Rasionalitas Instrumental dan Nilai (Terjemahan oleh A. H. I. Tjan dkk.). Penerbit Gramasurya.

Downloads

Published

05-11-2026

How to Cite

Kusno, A., Kundharu Saddhono, & Raheni Suhita. (2026). Analisis Linguistik Forensik Benturan Habitus dan Logika Korporasi dalam Ekosistem Birokrasi Episentrum Ibu Kota Nusantara. Prosiding SENALA (Seminar Nasional Linguistik Indonesia), 3, 86–103. Retrieved from https://senala.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/senala/article/view/58

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.